Latest in Propoganda scandal(s)

So how’s come nobody’s talkin’ about the Geobbles-style GOP plant yet?

Oh, and guess what? That’s a pseudonym, not his real name.

Oh, and guess what else? He may have looked at the CIA docs in the Plame Outing scandal, and is subpeanoed.

When will this fucking house of cards fall? Jeezus! What does Bush the younger have to do? Fataly sodomize a 2-year-old then snort coke off his dead back? Or would that just be “spreading freedom?”

[edit, link fixed, others added]

10 Replies to “Latest in Propoganda scandal(s)”

  1. That link didna work. I want to know what’s going on!

    Remember, when we do something wrong, it’s ok. It’s when brown people do it that it’s wrong.

  2. grumble, grumble, grumble.

    Once again, I repeat myself. Clinton didn’t do anything but get a damn blowjob and they tried to impeach him.

    These guys are clearly violating laws and ethics all over the place. And nary a word against them.

    Grumble, Grumble, Grumble.

  3. Nothing to see here, go about your day, lowly peon…uh I mean citizen.

    There’s an old Texas saying, from Tennesee, “Fuck me in the Ass, Cum on, no wait, it’s fuck this, no, it’s screw the people all the time, no, you can’t fuck with me!”

  4. I would call murdering Sudanese and Afghans in a knee-jerk reaction, (with Tomahawk missiles,) a little more than getting a damn blowjob.

  5. Aye, but that isn’t the reason they tried to impeach his ass. Nor did that have anything to do with the numerous independent investigations that happened during his presidency.

    There have been huge ethics violations that have been obvious and very little has been done to investigate the current administration.

    Talk about, Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

  6. American Republicans have embraced the philosophy that any means to a Good End (as they define it) is acceptable. Thus, lying, rigging elections, torturing prisoners, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians, etc., are unimportant, as long as they achieve an end that the neocons deem desirable.

    I don’t think they would tolerate him fatally sodomizing a 2-year-old boy, because that would be homosexual. They’d be totally ok with him ordering it done, though, so long as someone else carried it out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *